The eM1 Classic and eM5ii arrived the same day. After all the research and readjustment of my swap (eM1ii for Nikon –er em5ii –errr Ni .. nope em5ii) the original M1 is getting most of the attention. It was a tremendous bargain and most likely does all that I reasonably ‘need’ for this hobby. As long as both are here though, let’s find out for sure!
Differences are interesting, in part due to the lack of
them. The sensors are different, yet DxO tests show them to be nearly identical
in their particular tests. Neither sensor keeps up with the eM1ii, both are a pinch better
than the GX7. Both eM bodies have 'better' IS within, a single memory slot, weather seals and no AA filter.
With that out of the way, what do I have to choose from on the Oly side?
Phase detect AF (eM1) though not for every AF situation
- Tilt screen (eM1) is my preference by a decent margin
- Battery life is better on eM5ii thanks to its specific
quick-nap mode
- Grip is superior on eM1 without supplemental aids
- eM1 is a bit larger/heavier.. but the better grip is a part of
that
- Video specs are substantially more versatile on eM5ii
- eM5ii is silver.. OK I’m reaching now
- In my particular case the eM1 is over $250 cheaper!
So of these first-blush points, what matters to me?
Numbers
2 and 4 are big. My 70-300mm 4Thirds zoom might appreciate #1, though it’s cdaf-friendly by design. I’ve fallen for video specs before and
shot no videos to speak of - so #6 isn’t as relevant as I pretend it is. Both cameras feel fine as to bulk, so #5 is a draw. With three batteries for the eM1, item #3 isn’t a big deal, and I can fine-tune some time-out settings too.
So items 2, 4 and especially 8 provide my answer. Therefore, unless I am
disappointed in shooting with the eM1, it’s the better of the two for me. And if it's not a great fit, it's hard to imagine the 5ii being the right answer either - but it can give me its best attempt and possibly win out.